<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>STC AccessAbility SIG &#187; Internet Accessibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stc-access.org/category/focus/internet_access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stc-access.org</link>
	<description>An Accessibility &#38; Technical Communication Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Flash Accessibility Only on Windows?</title>
		<link>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/03/08/flash-accessibility-only-on-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/03/08/flash-accessibility-only-on-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kmardahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operating systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stc-access.org/?p=2330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Making Flash accessible is a good thing. However, accessible Flash is not perceivable by screen-reader users if they don&#8217;t use Windows. If a screen-reader user needs information that is contained in a Flash presentation, that user needs to be on Windows. Oops.
Everett Zufelt (@ezufelt) brought this to my attention on Twitter today shortly after I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/03/08/flash-accessibility-only-on-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympian Anger &#8211; Is It So Hard to Remember Accessibility?</title>
		<link>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/03/04/olympian-anger-is-it-so-hard-to-remember-accessibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/03/04/olympian-anger-is-it-so-hard-to-remember-accessibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kmardahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web accessibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stc-access.org/?p=2317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everett Zufelt&#8217;s open letter to CTV (Canada) regarding the accessibility of CTVOlympics.ca makes me angry.
I had already read Joe Clark&#8217;s article about the Vancouver Olympics websites being inaccessible to disabled people, as well as the Webaxe article. It was clear from Twitter that the sites were inaccessible.
So why should Everett Zufelt&#8217;s letter make me angry? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/03/04/olympian-anger-is-it-so-hard-to-remember-accessibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 Personas of IT Users with Disabilities &#8211; Thanks, AEGIS Project!</title>
		<link>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/02/16/15-personas-of-it-users-with-disabilities-thanks-aegis-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/02/16/15-personas-of-it-users-with-disabilities-thanks-aegis-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kmardahl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEGIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ÆGIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examples of accessibility needs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webdesign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stc-access.org/?p=2252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ÆGIS project has a gift for you &#8211; 15 personas of IT users with disabilities. No more procrastination on your projects!
Visit the Ægis persona page to download the PDF files for each persona. This blog post gives you a quick overview of the personas you&#8217;ll find on the Ægis site, as well as an [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stc-access.org/2010/02/16/15-personas-of-it-users-with-disabilities-thanks-aegis-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Logical Captcha Plugins for WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.stc-access.org/2009/09/01/new-logical-captcha-plugins-for-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stc-access.org/2009/09/01/new-logical-captcha-plugins-for-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CynthiaL</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPTCHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stc-access.org/?p=1837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently discovered two new logical-based captchas plugins for WordPress. 
1. Logical Captcha  (Version 1.0.3, Updated 2009-8-24) takes advantage of the TextCaptcha.com service, which provides logic-based textual questions instead of distorted images or audio to validate that the entity registering is a real live human being, and not a spam bot.
Textual logic-based captchas mean [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stc-access.org/2009/09/01/new-logical-captcha-plugins-for-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
